Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Effectiveness and safety of Chinese massage therapy (Tui Na) on post-stroke spasticity: a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial [with consumer summary]
Yang Y-J, Zhang J, Hou Y, Jiang B-Y, Pan H-F, Wang J, Zhong D-Y, Guo H-Y, Zhu Y, Cheng J
Clinical Rehabilitation 2017 Jul;31(7):904-912
clinical trial
9/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: Yes; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Chinese massage therapy (Tui Na) for patients with post-stroke spasticity. DESIGN: A prospective, multicenter, blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled intervention trial. SUBJECT: A total of 90 patients with post-stroke spasticity were randomly assigned to the experimental (Tui Na therapy) group (n = 45) or control (placebo Tui Na therapy) group (n = 45). INTERVENTION: Participants in the experimental group received Tui Na therapy, while those in the control group received placebo-Tai Na (gentle rubbing) for 20 to 25 minutes per limb, once per day, five days per week for a total of four weeks. All participants in both groups received conventional rehabilitation. MAIN MEASURE: The Modified Ashworth Scale, the Fugl-Meyer Assessment and the Modified Barthel Index were used to assess the severity of spasticity, motor function of limbs and activities of daily living, respectively. Assessments were performed at baseline, at four weeks and at three months. RESULTS: Tui Na group had a significantly greater reduction in Modified Ashworth Scale in only four muscle groups than the control did (elbow flexors, p = 0.026; wrist flexors, p = 0.005; knee flexors, p = 0.023; knee extensors, p = 0.017). Improvements were sustained at three months follow-up. There was no significant difference between the two groups in Fugl-Meyer Assessment (p = 0.503) and Modified Barthel Index (p = 0.544). No adverse reaction was recorded in any of the cases mentioned at all study sites. CONCLUSIONS: Tui Na might be a safe and effective treatment to reduce post-stroke spasticity of several muscle groups.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help