Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

The effectiveness and satisfaction of web-based physiotherapy in people with spinal cord injury: a pilot randomised controlled trial
Coulter EH, McLean AN, Hasler JP, Allan DB, McFadyen A, Paul L
Spinal Cord 2017 Apr;55(4):383-389
clinical trial
6/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

STUDY DESIGN: A pilot randomised controlled trial. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to evaluate the effectiveness and participant satisfaction of web-based physiotherapy in people with spinal cord injury (SCI). SETTING: Community patients of a national spinal injury unit in a university teaching hospital, Scotland, UK. METHODS: Twenty-four participants were recruited and randomised to receive 8 weeks of web-based physiotherapy (intervention), twice per week, or usual care (control). Individual exercise programmes were prescribed based on participants' abilities. The intervention was delivered via a website (www.webbasedphysio.com) and monitored and progressed remotely by the physiotherapist. RESULTS: Participants logged on to the website an average of 1.4 +/- 0.8 times per week. Between-group differences, although not significant, were more pronounced for the 6-min walk test. Participants were positive about using web-based physiotherapy and stated that they would be happy to use it again and would recommend it to others. Overall, it was rated as either good or excellent. CONCLUSIONS: Web-based physiotherapy was feasible and acceptable for people with SCI. Participants achieved good compliance with the intervention and rated the programme highly and beneficial for health and well-being at various states after injury. The results of this study warrant further work with a more homogeneous sample. SPONSORSHIP: This study was funded by the Queen Elizabeth National Spinal Injuries Unit, Glasgow, UK.
Reprinted by permission from Spinal Cord, Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help