Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Landing technique and performance in youth athletes after a single injury-prevention program session [with consumer summary]
Root H, Trojian T, Martinez J, Kraemer W, di Stefano LJ
Journal of Athletic Training 2015 Nov;50(11):1149-1157
clinical trial
7/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: Yes; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

CONTEXT: Injury-prevention programs (IPPs) performed as season-long warm-ups improve injury rates, performance outcomes, and jump-landing technique. However, concerns regarding program adoption exist. Identifying the acute benefits of using an IPP compared with other warm-ups may encourage IPP adoption. OBJECTIVE: To examine the immediate effects of 3 warm-up protocols (IPP, static warm-up (SWU), or dynamic warm-up (DWU)) on jump-landing technique and performance measures in youth athletes. DESIGN: Randomized controlled clinical trial. SETTING: Gymnasiums. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Sixty male and 29 female athletes (age 13 +/- 2 years, height 162.8 +/- 12.6 cm, mass 37.1 +/- 13.5 kg) volunteered to participate in a single session. INTERVENTION(S): Participants were stratified by age, sex, and sport and then were randomized into 1 protocol: IPP, SWU, or DWU. The IPP consisted of dynamic flexibility, strengthening, plyometric, and balance exercises and emphasized proper technique. The SWU consisted of jogging and lower extremity static stretching. The DWU consisted of dynamic lower extremity flexibility exercises. Participants were assessed for landing technique and performance measures immediately before (PRE) and after (POST) completing their warm-ups. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): One rater graded each jump-landing trial using the Landing Error Scoring System. Participants performed a vertical jump, long jump, shuttle run, and jump-landing task in randomized order. The averages of all jump-landing trials and performance variables were used to calculate 1 composite score for each variable at PRE and POST. Change scores were calculated (POST- PRE) for all measures. Separate 1-way (group) analyses of variance were conducted for each dependent variable (alpha < 0.05). RESULTS: No differences were observed among groups for any performance measures (p > 0.05). The Landing Error Scoring System scores improved after the IPP (change -0.40 +/- 1.24 errors) compared with the DWU (0.27 +/- 1.09 errors) and SWU (0.43 +/- 1.35 errors; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: An IPP did not impair sport performance and may have reduced injury risk, which supports the use of these programs before sport activity.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help