Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
| Effect of mirror therapy on upper extremity motor function in stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial |
| Gurbuz N, Afsar SI, Ayas S, Cosar SNS |
| Journal of Physical Therapy Science 2016 Sep;28(9):2501-2506 |
| clinical trial |
| 5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
|
PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of mirror therapy combined with a conventional rehabilitation program on upper extremity motor and functional recovery in stroke patients. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty-one hemiplegic patients were included. The patients were randomly assigned to a mirror (n = 16) or conventional group (n = 15). The patients in both groups underwent conventional therapy for 4 weeks (60 to 120 minutes/day, 5 days/week). The mirror group received mirror therapy, consisting of periodic flexion and extension movements of the wrist and fingers on the non-paralyzed side. The patients in the conventional group performed the same exercises against the non-reflecting face of the mirror. The patients were evaluated at the beginning and end of the treatment by a blinded assessor using the Brunnstrom stage, Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) upper extremity score, and the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) self-care score. RESULTS: There was an improvement in Brunnstrom stage and the FIM self-care score in both groups, but the post-treatment FMA score was significantly higher in the mirror therapy group than in the conventional treatment group. CONCLUSION: Mirror therapy in addition to a conventional rehabilitation program was found to provide additional benefit in motor recovery of the upper extremity in stroke patients.
|