Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Effects of physical activity intervention on physical and cognitive function in sedentary adults with and without diabetes
Espeland MA, Lipska K, Miller ME, Rushing J, Cohen RA, Verghese J, McDermott MM, King AC, Strotmeyer ES, Blair SN, Pahor M, Reid K, Demons J, Kritchevsky SB, for the LIFE Study Investigators
The Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 2017 Jun;72(6):861-866
clinical trial
4/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes mellitus may alter the effect of physical activity on physical and cognitive function. METHODS: The Lifestyle Interventions and Independence for Elders (LIFE) trial randomized controlled clinical trial of physical activity intervention (walking, resistance training, and flexibility exercises) enrolled adults aged 70 to 89 years who were sedentary and non-demented and who had functional limitations. Standardized measures of physical and cognitive function were collected an average of 2 years post-randomization. Differences between the intervention and control groups from 415 individuals with diabetes and 1,061 individuals without diabetes were contrasted with analyses of covariance. RESULTS: At 24 months, assignment to the physical activity intervention resulted in 0.019 m/s relatively faster average 400-meter gait speeds (p = 0.007 overall) both for individuals with and without diabetes (intervention x diabetes interaction p = 0.99). No benefits were seen on scores from a physical performance battery. Performance on cognitive tests was better among participants assigned to the physical activity intervention compared with control only for those with diabetes, particularly for global cognitive function (p = 0.02) and delayed memory (p = 0.005), with mean (95% confidence intervals) for benefit from physical activity intervention of 0.114 (0.007 to 0.111) and 0.208 (0.030 to 0.387) standard deviations, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Physical activity intervention improved the gait speed of older, sedentary individuals with and without diabetes. The cognitive function benefits occurred among participants with, but not without, diabetes. The mechanisms through which physical activity affects physical and cognitive function in older adults may differ for individuals by diabetes status.
Copyright the Gerontological Society of America. Reproduced by permission of the publisher.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help