Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Benefits of the restorative exercise and strength training for operational resilience and excellence yoga program for chronic lower back pain in service members: a pilot randomized control trial
Highland KB, Schoomaker A, Rojas W, Suen J, Ahmed A, Zhang Z, Carlin SF, Calilung C, Kent M, Buckenmaier C III
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2018 Jan;99(1):91-98
clinical trial
6/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVE: To examine the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of an individualized yoga program. DESIGN: Pilot randomized control trial. SETTING: Military medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (n = 68) with chronic LBP. INTERVENTIONS: Restorative Exercise and Strength Training for Operational Resilience and Excellence (RESTORE) program (9 to 12 individual yoga sessions) or treatment-as-usual (control) for 8-week period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was past 24-hour pain scores (Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale). Secondary outcomes included disability (Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire), physical functioning, and symptom burden (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 subscales). Assessment occurred at baseline, week 4, week 8, 3-month follow-up, and 6-month follow-up. Exploratory outcomes included the proportion of participants in each group reporting clinically meaningful changes at 3-month and 6-month follow-ups. RESULTS: Generalized linear mixed models with sequential Bonferroni-corrected pairwise significance tests and Chi-square analyses examined longitudinal outcomes. Secondary outcome significance tests were Bonferroni-adjusted for multiple outcome tests. The RESTORE group reported improved pain, compared to the control group. Secondary outcomes did not retain significance after Bonferroni-adjustments for multiple outcomes. Though, a greater proportion RESTORE participants reported clinically-meaningfully changes in all outcome at 3-month follow-up and symptom burden at 6-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: RESTORE may be a viable non-pharmacologic approach to LBP with minimal side effects and research efforts are needed to compare effectiveness of RESTORE delivery formats (eg, group versus individual) or to other treatment modalities.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help