Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Short-term efficacy of hand-arm bimanual intensive training on upper arm function in acute stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial |
Meng G, Meng X, Tan Y, Yu J, Jin A, Zhao Y, Liu X |
Frontiers in Neurology 2018 Jan 19;8(726):Epub |
clinical trial |
7/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
BACKGROUND: Rehabilitation training during the acute phase of stroke (< 48 h) markedly improves impaired upper-limb movement. Hand-arm bimanual intensive training (HABIT) represents an intervention that promotes improvements in upper extremity function in children with cerebral palsy. This study repurposed HABIT in acute stroke patients and assessed recovery of upper extremity function when compared with a conventional rehabilitation program (CRP). METHODS: In a randomized trial, 128 patients with acute stroke were assigned to the HABIT or the CRP groups. The primary endpoint was clinical motor functional assessment that was guided by the Fugl-Meyer motor assessment (FMA) and outcomes of the action research arm test (ARAT). The secondary endpoint was an improved neurophysiological evaluation according to the motor-evoked potential amplitude (AMP), resting motion threshold (RMT), and central motor conduction time (CMCT) scores over the 2-week course of therapy. In both groups, scores were evaluated at baseline, 1 week from commencing therapy, and post-therapy. RESULTS: After 2 weeks, the HABIT group showed improved scores as compared the CRP group for FMA (51.7 +/- 6.44 versus 43.5 +/- 5.6, p < 0.001), ARAT (34.5 +/- 6.2 versus 33.3 +/- 6.3, p = 0.022), and AMP (1.1 +/- 0.1 versus 1.0 +/- 0.1, p < 0.001). However, CMCT (8.6 +/- 1.0 versus 9.1 +/- 0.6, p = 0.054) and RMT (55.3 +/- 4.2 versus 57.5 +/- 4.1, p = 0.088) were similar when comparing between groups. CONCLUSION: HABIT significantly improved motor functional and neuro-physiological outcomes in patients with acute stroke, which suggested that HABIT might represent an improved therapeutic strategy as compared CRP.
|