Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
| Clinical and cost-effectiveness of home-based cardiac rehabilitation compared to conventional, centre-based cardiac rehabilitation: results of the FIT@Home study |
| Kraal JJ, van den Akker-van Marle ME, Abu-Hanna A, Stut W, Peek N, Kemps HMC |
| European Journal of Preventive Cardiology 2017 Aug;24(12):1260-1273 |
| clinical trial |
| 8/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
|
Copyright release for this abstract has not been granted.
|