Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Combining functional electrical stimulation and mirror therapy for upper limb motor recovery following stroke: a randomised trial |
Mathieson S, Parsons J, Kaplan M, Parsons M |
European Journal of Physiotherapy 2018;20(4):244-249 |
clinical trial |
8/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
INTRODUCTION: There is a growing need to develop effective rehabilitation interventions for people presenting with stroke as healthcare services experience ever-increasing pressures on staff and resources. The primary objective of this research is to examine the effect that mirror therapy combined with functional electrical stimulation has on upper limb motor recovery and functional outcome for a sample of people admitted to an inpatient stroke unit. METHODS: A total of 50 participants were randomised to one of three treatment arms; functional electrical stimulation, mirror therapy or a combined intervention of functional electrical stimulation with mirror therapy. Socio-demographic and health information was collected at recruitment together with admission dates, medical diagnoses and baseline measures. Blinded assessments were undertaken at baseline and at discharge post-stroke by a registered physiotherapist and a clinical nurse specialist. RESULTS: The Action Research Arm Test and the Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity assessment revealed statistically superior results for functional electrical stimulation compared with mirror therapy alone (p = 0.03). There were no other significant differences between the three groups. CONCLUSION: The theory of combining interventions requires further investigation and warrants further research. Combining current interventions may have the potential to enhance stroke rehabilitation, improve functional outcomes and help reduce the overall burden of stroke.
|