Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Effectiveness of client-centered "tune-ups" on community reintegration, mobility, and quality of life after stroke: a randomized controlled trial
Brouwer B, Bryant D, Garland SJ
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2018 Jul;99(7):1325-1332
clinical trial
6/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVE: To explore the effectiveness of a 2-week client-centered rehabilitation intervention (tune-up) delivered 6 months after inpatient discharge on community reintegration at 1 year in people with stroke. DESIGN: A multicenter randomized controlled trial with 2 groups: an intervention ("tune-up") group and a control group having the same exposure to assessment. SETTING: Three research laboratories. PARTICIPANTS: Participants (n = 103) with hemiparetic stroke recruited from inpatient rehabilitation units at the time of discharge. INTERVENTIONS: Participants randomized to the tune-up group received 1-hour therapy sessions in their home 3times/wk for 2 weeks at 6 months postdischarge focusing on identified mobility-related goals. A second tune-up was provided at 12 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Community reintegration measured by the Subjective Index of Physical and Social Outcome at 12 months and secondary outcomes included the Berg Balance Scale and measures of mobility and health-related quality of life up to 15 months. RESULTS: At 12 months, both groups showed significant improvement in community reintegration (p < 0.05), a trend evident at all time points, with no difference between groups (mean difference -0.5; 95% confidence interval -1.8 to 2.7; p = 0.68). Similarly, a main effect of time reflected improvement in mobility-related and quality of life outcomes for both groups (p <= 0.0.5), but no group differences (p >= 0.30). CONCLUSIONS: All participants in the tune-up group met or exceeded at least 1 mobility-related goal; however, the intervention did not differentially improve community reintegration. The improvements in mobility and quality of life over the 15-month postdischarge period may be secondary to high activity levels in both study groups and exposure to regular assessment.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help