Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
|Impairment-based rehabilitation with patterned electrical neuromuscular stimulation and lower extremity function in individuals with patellofemoral pain: a preliminary study [with consumer summary]|
|Glaviano NR, Marshall AN, Mangum LC, Hart JM, Hertel J, Russell S, Saliba SA|
|Journal of Athletic Training 2019 Mar;54(3):255-269|
|8/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*|
CONTEXT: Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is a chronic condition that presents with lower extremity muscle weakness, decreased flexibility, subjective functional limitations, pain, and decreased physical activity. Patterned electrical neuromuscular stimulation (PENS) has been shown to affect muscle activation and pain after a single treatment, but its use has not been studied in a rehabilitation trial. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of a 4-week impairment-based rehabilitation program using PENS on subjective function, pain, strength, range of motion, and physical activity in individuals with PFP. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: A total of 21 patients with PFP (5 males, 16 females; age 23.4 +/- 7.6 years, height 168.0 +/- 7.5 cm, mass 69.0 +/- 19.5 kg). INTERVENTION(S): Participants completed a 4-week supervised rehabilitation program in conjunction with random assignment to receive PENS or sham treatments. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Subjective function, pain, strength, range of motion, and physical activity levels were assessed prerehabilitation and postrehabilitation. Subjective function and pain were also assessed at 6 and 12 months postrehabilitation. Repeated-measures analyses of variance and Tukey post hoc testing were conducted with alpha <= 0.05. We calculated Cohen d effect sizes with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Both groups had statistically and clinically meaningful differences in subjective function, pain, strength, range of motion, and activity level after 4 weeks of impairment-based rehabilitation. Improved subjective function was observed in both groups at 6 and 12 months after the interventions. The PENS group had improvements in current pain for all 3 postrehabilitation times compared with baseline measures. CONCLUSIONS: An impairment-based intervention effectively improved subjective function, pain, strength, range of motion, and physical activity levels in individuals with PFP. Participants who received PENS in addition to the rehabilitation program had improved current pain at 6 and 12 months postrehabilitation compared with baseline scores. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02441712.