Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
|Moderate-pain versus pain-free exercise, walking capacity, and cardiovascular health in patients with peripheral artery disease [with consumer summary]|
|Novakovic M, Krevel B, Rajkovic U, Vizintin Cuderman T, Jansa Trontelj K, Fras Z, Jug B|
|Journal of Vascular Surgery 2019 Mar 25:Epub ahead of print|
|6/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*|
OBJECTIVE: Supervised exercise training (walking) is recommended in patients with intermittent claudication, both as a means to improve symptoms (walking distance and quality of life (QoL)) and as a means to improve general cardiovascular health (including vascular function and heart rate variability (HRV)). Our aim was to compare two types of supervised training (moderate-pain and pain-free walking) with comparable intensity based on heart rate, in terms of walking capacity, QoL, vascular function, biomarkers, and HRV in patients with intermittent claudication. METHODS: Thirty-six adults with intermittent claudication were randomized to either moderate-pain or pain-free exercise training (36 sessions, two or three times a week) or usual care (no supervised exercise). Initial walking distance and absolute walking distance using treadmill testing, flow-mediated vasodilation and pulse wave velocity using ultrasound, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and fibrinogen levels, HRV, and QoL (36-Item Short Form Health Survey questionnaire) were determined at baseline and after the intervention period. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients (mean age 64 +/- 9 years; 72% male) completed the study. Both training programs similarly improved walking capacity. Initial walking distance and absolute walking distance significantly increased with either moderate-pain walking (median 50 m to 107 m (p = 0.005) and 85 m to 194 m (p = 0.005), respectively) or pain-free walking (median, 53 m to 128 m (p = 0.003) and 92 m to 163 m (p = 0.003), respectively). QoL also similarly improved with both training modalities, whereas only moderate-pain walking was also associated with a statistically significant improvement in the vascular parameters flow-mediated vasodilation (4.4% to 8.0%; p = 0.002) and pulse wave velocity (6.6 m/s to 6.1 m/s; p = 0.013). Neither training program was associated with changes in biomarker levels and HRV. CONCLUSIONS: Both moderate-pain and pain-free training modalities were safe and similarly improved walking capacity and health-related QoL. Conversely, vascular function improvements were associated with only moderate-pain walking.