Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Effects of a muscular stretching and strengthening school-based exercise program on posture, trunk mobility, and musculoskeletal pain among elementary schoolchildren -- a randomized controlled trial
Vieira Batistao M, Carnaz L, de Fatima Carreira Moreira R, de Oliveira Sato T
Fisioterapia em Movimento [Physical Therapy in Movement] 2019;32:e003208
clinical trial
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

INTRODUCTION: The exercise benefits for the most prevalent postural changes require proper investigation, with large samples, control group, and concealed allocation. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of a muscular stretching and strengthening school-based exercise program on posture, trunk mobility, and musculoskeletal pain among elementary schoolchildren. METHOD: Three hundred students from three schools in Brazil were evaluated. Stretching and strengthening exercises, twice a week, for eight weeks in group sessions were provided by one physiotherapist. The control group did not undergo any intervention. Head, back and shoulder posture were qualitatively evaluated. Head and trunk alignment were evaluated using the Posture Assessment Software. Cervical, thoracic, low back and upper limb pain were assessed for the last seven days. The trunk mobility was recorded through the flexibility of the posterior chain. Posture, pain and trunk mobility were recorded at baseline and after the intervention. Groups were compared using Chi2 test, two-way MANOVA, and two-way ANOVA, with a set at 5%. RESULTS: Shoulder posture showed significant results (p = 0.04), the intervention group showed the lower worsening rate. In the quantitative evaluation, a statistically significant difference was observed between assessments (p < 0.01 for head and trunk; ES 0.53) but not between groups. The intervention group had a higher percentage of improvement in the overall musculoskeletal pain (p = 0.04; ES 0.54). Mobility decreased an average of 1.8 degrees in the control group and increased 5.0 degrees in the intervention group, without statistical significance. CONCLUSION: The program was effective in reducing pain level and shoulder misalignment at the intervention group.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help