Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Family physical activity planning and child physical activity outcomes: a randomized trial
Rhodes RE, Blanchard CM, Quinlan A, Naylor PJ, Warburton DER
American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2019 Aug;57(2):135-144
clinical trial
6/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

INTRODUCTION: Regular moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and high physical fitness are extremely important to the health of children and track to positive health profiles in adulthood. Family-based interventions to improve moderate-to-vigorous physical activity are essential given that children live within a structure of parental influence. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of a parent planning skills intervention to support child physical activity on the subsequent moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (primary outcome) and fitness of their children across 26 weeks (primary endpoint). STUDY DESIGN: Two-arm randomized trial with physical activity assessment at baseline 6 weeks, 13 weeks, and 26 weeks and fitness and BMI tests at baseline and 26 weeks from 2012 and 2017. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and two children (aged 6 to 12 years) who were below international physical activity recommendations at baseline were recruited through advertisements. INTERVENTION: Participants received a planning plus education intervention (n = 52) or an education-only intervention (n = 50). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity was assessed via accelerometry and fitness tests included aerobic fitness, muscular strength, flexibility. BMI was calculated by objectively assessed height and weight. RESULTS: Generalized linear mixed modeling conducted in 2019 showed that the patterns varied by condition over time (beta -0.05, p < 0.05), where children in the planning intervention significantly increased moderate-to-vigorous physical activity compared with the education condition at 6 weeks and 13 weeks but not at 26 weeks. Aerobic fitness (p = 0.04, d = 0.26) was the only significant health-related physical fitness change between the two groups and favored the planning group over the education group. CONCLUSIONS: There was initial efficacy of the planning intervention, but effectiveness waned by 26 weeks. These changes appeared to be sufficient for modest changes in aerobic fitness. Future research should aim to improve the maintenance of these early positive changes and assist parents in planning for activities that also include opportunities to improve child musculoskeletal fitness. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01882192.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help