Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Intradialytic exercise with blood flow restriction is more effective than conventional exercise in improving walking endurance in hemodialysis patients: a randomized controlled trial [with consumer summary]
Cardoso RK, Araujo AM, del Vechio FB, Bohlke M, Barcellos FC, Oses JP, de Freitas MP, Rombaldi AJ
Clinical Rehabilitation 2020 Jan;34(1):91-98
clinical trial
7/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare the effect of intradialytic aerobic exercise with blood flow restriction, without blood flow restriction (conventional) and no exercise (control) on muscle strength and walking endurance among chronic kidney disease patients. DESIGN: Open label and parallel group randomized controlled trial. SUBJECTS: Adult patients with chronic kidney disease on hemodialysis. INTERVENTION: A 12-week intradialytic training with or without blood flow restriction compared with a control group. MAIN MEASURES: Strength and walking endurance were measured using thoracolumbar dynamometry and a 6-minute walk test, respectively, before and after training. RESULTS: A total of 66 patients were randomized into three groups: blood flow restriction group (n = 22), conventional exercise group (n = 22) and control group (n = 22). There were seven dropouts, and 59 patients were included in the analysis. There was a significant increase in the 6-minute walking distance in the blood flow restriction group (from 412.7 (115.9) to 483.0 (131.0) m, p = 0.007) in comparison with the conventional exercise group (from 426.79 (115.00) to 433.2 (120.42) m, not significant) and the control group (from 428.4 (108.1) to 417.3 (100.2) m, not significant). The change in the walking distance over time was significantly different among groups (intervention group/time, p = 0.02). The simple effects test found a significant time effect only in the blood flow restriction group. There was no significant difference in strength change between the groups. CONCLUSION: Among chronic kidney disease patients, intradialytic exercise of low/moderate intensity with blood flow restriction was more effective in improving walking endurance than conventional exercise or no exercise.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help