Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Educacion grupal frente a individual en pacientes diabeticos tipo 2 (Group versus individual education for type-2 diabetes patients) [Spanish; with consumer summary] |
Dalmau Llorca MR, Garcia Bernal G, Aguilar Martin C, Palau Galindo A |
Atencion Primaria 2003;32(1):36-41 |
clinical trial |
4/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: No. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of group (GE) and individual (IE) health education in type-2 diabetes patients, and identify the improvement in knowledge, metabolic control and risk factors. DESIGN: Randomised clinical trial. SETTING: Primary care. PARTICIPANTS: 68 patients with type-2 diabetes, diagnosed 6 months before the start of the study and who had not received GE. Patients aged over 75, those with sensory, psychological and/or physical deficiencies and those not monitored in primary care were excluded (alpha 0.05; beta 0.2). INTERVENTIONS: Patients were selected according to the inclusion criteria and allocated at random to the IE (n = 33) or GE (n = 35) group. Individual and group lessons were given at the same time for a year. The contents were evaluated with a validated, self-administered test. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: General, demographic variables, analyses, blood pressure, the Body Mass Index (BMI), the presence of cardiovascular risk factors, diabetes-related complications and therapeutic variables were all measured. RESULTS: The two kinds of education showed no significant differences from each other. The two groups improved the level of knowledge (p < 0.001), and reduced HbA1c (p < 0.001), HDL-C (p < 0.001), the BMI (p = 0.001) and systolic pressure (p = 0.004), and increased their use of reactive strips (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Health education on diabetes improved knowledge of the disease, metabolic control and cardiovascular risk factors. The two educational methods evaluated were equally effective.
|