Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Educacion grupal frente a individual en pacientes diabeticos tipo 2 (Group versus individual education for type-2 diabetes patients) [Spanish; with consumer summary]
Dalmau Llorca MR, Garcia Bernal G, Aguilar Martin C, Palau Galindo A
Atencion Primaria 2003;32(1):36-41
clinical trial
4/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: No. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of group (GE) and individual (IE) health education in type-2 diabetes patients, and identify the improvement in knowledge, metabolic control and risk factors. DESIGN: Randomised clinical trial. SETTING: Primary care. PARTICIPANTS: 68 patients with type-2 diabetes, diagnosed 6 months before the start of the study and who had not received GE. Patients aged over 75, those with sensory, psychological and/or physical deficiencies and those not monitored in primary care were excluded (alpha 0.05; beta 0.2). INTERVENTIONS: Patients were selected according to the inclusion criteria and allocated at random to the IE (n = 33) or GE (n = 35) group. Individual and group lessons were given at the same time for a year. The contents were evaluated with a validated, self-administered test. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: General, demographic variables, analyses, blood pressure, the Body Mass Index (BMI), the presence of cardiovascular risk factors, diabetes-related complications and therapeutic variables were all measured. RESULTS: The two kinds of education showed no significant differences from each other. The two groups improved the level of knowledge (p < 0.001), and reduced HbA1c (p < 0.001), HDL-C (p < 0.001), the BMI (p = 0.001) and systolic pressure (p = 0.004), and increased their use of reactive strips (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Health education on diabetes improved knowledge of the disease, metabolic control and cardiovascular risk factors. The two educational methods evaluated were equally effective.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help