Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Kinesio Taping versus compression garments for treating breast cancer-related lymphedema: a randomized, cross-over, controlled trial [with consumer summary]
Pajero Otero V, Garcia Delgado E, Martin Cortijo C, Romay Barrero HM, de Carlos Iriarte E, Avendano-Coy J
Clinical Rehabilitation 2019 Dec;33(12):1887-1897
clinical trial
6/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: No; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of Kinesio Taping compared to compression garments during maintenance phase of complex decongestive therapy for breast cancer-related lymphedema. DESIGN: Randomized, cross-over, controlled trial. SETTING: Outpatient tertiary-level hospital rehabilitation setting. SUBJECTS: Randomized sample of 30 women with breast cancer-related lymphedema. INTERVENTIONS: Participants received two interventions, Kinesio Taping and compression garment, both lasting four weeks, whose order was randomized by blocks. A four-week washout period was established prior to the interventions and between them. MEASUREMENTS: The main outcome was the lymphedema relative volume change. Secondary outcomes were range of motion of arm joints, self-perception of comfort, and lymphedema-related symptoms (pain, tightness, heaviness, and hardness). RESULTS: The decrease in the relative volume change was greater in the Kinesio Taping intervention (-5.7%, SD 2.0) compared to that observed using compression garments (-3.4%, SD 2.9) (p < 0.001). The range of motion of five upper-limb movements increased after applying taping (between 5.8 degrees and 16.7 degrees) (p < 0.05), but not after compression (p > 0.05). In addition, taping was perceived as more comfortable by patients (between 2.4 and 3 points better than compression in four questions with a 5-point scale (p < 0.001)) and further reduced lymphedema-related symptoms compared to compression (between 0.96 and 1.40 points better in four questions with a 6-point scale (p < 0.05)). CONCLUSION: Kinesio Taping was more effective than compression garments for reducing the lymphedema volume, with less severe lymphedema-related symptoms, better improvement of upper-limb mobility, and more comfort.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help