Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Effectiveness of modified constraint-induced movement therapy compared with bimanual therapy home programs for infants with hemiplegia: a randomized controlled trial [with consumer summary] |
Chamudot R, Parush S, Rigbi A, Horovitz R, Gross-Tsur V |
The American Journal of Occupational Therapy 2018 Nov-Dec;72(6):7206205010 |
clinical trial |
6/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
OBJECTIVE: We examined the effectiveness of modified constraint-induced movement therapy (mCIMT) in treating infants with hemiplegic cerebral palsy and compared therapy outcomes with a nonconstraining bimanual therapy (BIM) of equal intensity. METHOD: In a single-blinded randomized controlled trial, 33 infants with hemiplegia (mean corrected age 11.1 mo, standard deviation 2.2) received either mCIMT (n = 17) or BIM (n = 16). Both interventions included home programs encouraging the use of the affected hand during daily 1-hr play sessions for 8 wk. Outcome measures were administered pre- and posttreatment and included the Mini-Assisting Hand Assessment for babies and the Functional Inventory. At baseline, parents also filled out the Dimensions of Mastery Questionnaire. RESULTS: Both groups demonstrated a significantly large and equal improvement in hand and gross motor function posttreatment (p < 0.001) and high treatment compliance. CONCLUSION: mCIMT and BIM are equally effective methods for treating infants with hemiplegia.
|