Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Effects of low- and high-intensity physical exercise on physical and cognitive function in older persons with dementia: a randomized controlled trial
Sanders LMJ, Hortobagyi T, Karssemeijer EGA, van der Zee EA, Scherder EJA, van Heuvelen MJG
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy 2020 Mar 10;12(28):Epub
clinical trial
6/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

BACKGROUND: Potential moderators such as exercise intensity or apolipoprotein-E4 (ApoE4) carriership may determine the magnitude of exercise effects on physical and cognitive functions in patients with dementia (PwD). We determined the effects of a 24-week aerobic and strength training program with a low- and high-intensity phase on physical and cognitive function. METHODS: In an assessor-blinded randomized trial, 91 PwD (all-cause dementia, recruited from daycare and residential care facilities, age 82.3 +/- 7.0 years, 59 women, Mini-Mental State Examination 20.2 +/- 4.4) were allocated to the exercise or control group. In the exercise group, PwD participated in a walking and lower limb strength training program with 12 weeks low- and 12 weeks high-intensity training offered three times/week. Attention-matched control participants performed flexibility exercises and recreational activities. We assessed adherence, compliance, and exercise intensity for each session. We assessed physical (endurance, gait speed, mobility, balance, leg strength) and cognitive (verbal memory, visual memory, executive function, inhibitory control, psychomotor speed) functions with performance-based tests at baseline and after 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 weeks (follow-up). ApoE4 carriership was determined post-intervention. RESULTS: Sixty-nine PwD were analyzed. Their mean attendance was approximately 60% during the study period. There were no significant effects of the exercise versus control intervention on endurance, mobility, balance, and leg strength in favor of the exercise group (Cohen's d = 0.13 to 0.18). Gait speed significantly improved with approximately 0.05 m/s after the high-intensity phase for exercise participants (Cohen's d = 0.41) but declined at follow-up. There were no significant effects of the exercise versus control intervention on any of the cognitive measures (Cohen's d approximately -0.04). ApoE4 carriership did not significantly moderate exercise effects on physical or cognitive function. CONCLUSIONS: Exercise was superior to control activities for gait speed in our sample of PwD. However, the training effect provided no protection for mobility loss after detraining (follow-up). There were no beneficial effects of the exercise versus control group on cognitive function. Exercise intensity moderated the effects of exercise on gait speed. ApoE4 carriership moderated the effect of exercise on global cognition only (trend level). TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register NTR5035. Registered on 2 March 2015.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help