Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
| An innovative STRoke Interactive Virtual thErapy (STRIVE) online platform for community-dwelling stroke survivors: a randomized controlled trial |
| Johnson L, Bird M-L, Muthalib M, Teo W-P |
| Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2020 Jul;101(7):1131-1137 |
| clinical trial |
| 8/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
|
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the STRoke Interactive Virtual thErapy (STRIVE) intervention on upper-extremity clinical outcomes in community-dwelling stroke survivors. DESIGN: Assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Study screening and testing was conducted in a university clinic. Participants completed the virtual therapy (VT) intervention in a community-based stroke support group setting. PARTICIPANTS: Of 124 stroke survivors initially assessed, 60 participants were recruited (time poststroke, 13.4 +/- 8.9 y). Participants were allocated to either VT or control group using a block randomization design and were stratified by sex. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomized to receive 8 weeks of VT or usual care. The intervention consisted of approximately 45 minutes of twice weekly VT training on the Jintronix Rehabilitation System. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Between-group differences in the Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity scale and Action Research Arm Test score were joint primary outcomes in this study. RESULTS: Significant between-group differences for the Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity scale were seen at the end of the intervention (F[1,1] = 5.37, p = 0.02, d = 0.41). No significant differences were observed with the Action Research Arm Test. No adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated clinically meaningful improvements in gross upper extremity motor function and use of the affected arm after a VT intervention delivered via a community-based stroke support group setting. This data adds to the contexts in which VT can be used to improve upper limb function. Use of VT in community-based rehabilitation in chronic stroke recovery is supported.
|