Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Efficacy of inspiratory muscle training on inspiratory muscle function, functional capacity, and quality of life in patients with asthma: a randomized controlled trial [with consumer summary]
Lage SM, Pereira DAG, Corradi Magalhaes Nepomuceno AL, de Castro AC, Araujo AG, Hoffman M, Silveira BMF, Parreira VF
Clinical Rehabilitation 2021 Jun;35(6):870-881
clinical trial
7/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of an inspiratory muscle training protocol on inspiratory muscle function, functional capacity, and quality of life in patients with asthma. DESIGN: A single-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial. SETTING: Community-based. SUBJECTS: Patients with asthma, aged between 20 and 70 years old, non-smokers. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomized into two groups: inspiratory muscle training group performed inspiratory muscle training 5 days a week for 8 weeks, consisting of six sets of 30 breaths per day with a training load 50% of maximal inspiratory pressure, plus an educational program; the control group only received the educational program. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Maximal inspiratory pressure, inspiratory muscle endurance, and the distance performed on the incremental shuttle walking test were assessed pre-intervention, post-intervention and at follow-up (3 months after the end of the intervention). The asthma quality of life questionnaire was applied pre and post-intervention. RESULTS: Data from 39 participants were analyzed. Maximal inspiratory pressure in percentage of predicted and endurance test duration were significantly higher post-intervention in the inspiratory muscle training group (post minus pre 50.8% versus 7.3% of predicted -- p < 0.001 and post minus pre 207.9 seconds versus 2.7 seconds -- p < 0.001, respectively). There was no significant difference in the incremental shuttle walking distance between groups (post minus pre 30.9 m versus -8.1 m, p = 0.165). Quality of life was perceived as significantly better, without a difference between groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: About 8 weeks of inspiratory muscle training in patients with controlled asthma significantly increased inspiratory muscle strength and endurance.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help