Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

A randomized controlled crossover trial of virtual reality in maintenance cardiovascular rehabilitation in a low-resource setting: impact on adherence, motivation, and engagement
da Cruz MMA, Ricci-Vitor AL, Borges GLB, da Silva PF, Turri-Silva N, Takahashi C, Grace SL, Vanderlei LCM
PTJ: Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal 2021 May;101(5):pzab071
clinical trial
7/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of adding virtual reality (VR) to maintenance cardiac rehabilitation (CR); it was hypothesized to increase adherence, motivation, and engagement. METHODS: This study was a randomized, 1:1 concealed-allocation, single-blinded, 2 parallel-arm crossover trial. Blinded assessments were undertaken at baseline (mid-program), 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after baseline. The setting was a single CR program of unlimited duration in Brazil. Participants were patients with cardiovascular diseases or risk factors who had been in the program for >= 3 months. The CR program consisted of 3 supervised exercise sessions per week. In the VR arm, participants had 1 VR session of the 3 per week during the initial 12 weeks of the trial; this was withdrawn the subsequent 12 weeks. Measures were: program adherence (% of 3 sessions/week over 12 weeks; ascertained in all participants), motivation (Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire 3), and engagement (User Engagement Scale, adapted; vigor, dedication, and absorption subscales); all 3 were primary outcomes. RESULTS: Sixty-one (83.6%) patients were randomized (n = 30 to CR+VR); 54 (88.5%) were retained at 12 and 24 weeks. At baseline, participants had been in CR on average 7 years and had high engagement and motivation. CR+VR resulted in a significant increase in adherence at 12 weeks (baseline 72.87%; 12 weeks 82.80%), with significant reductions at 24 weeks when VR was withdrawn (65.48%); in the usual CR care arm, there were no changes over time. There was a significant effect for arm, with significantly higher adherence in the CR+VR arm than usual CR at 12 weeks (73.51%). Motivation decreased significantly from baseline to 12 weeks (4.32 (SD 0.37) versus 4.02 (SD 0.76)) and significantly increased from 12 to 24 weeks in the CR+VR arm (4.37 (SD 0.36)). Absorption was significantly lower at 12 weeks in the CR+VR arm (6.79 (SD 0.37) versus 6.20 (SD 1.01)). CONCLUSION: Although VR increased program adherence, interspersing it with usual CR sessions actually decreased patient motivation and absorption. IMPACT: Supplementing a maintenance CR program with VR using "exergames" resulted in significantly greater adherence (8% increase or 3/36 sessions), and this was quite a robust effect given it was extinguished with the removal of VR. However, contrary to hypotheses, offering 1 session of VR per week and 2 of usual CR exercise was related to lower motivation and absorption, which has implications for how clinicians design programs for this patient population.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help