Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
A randomized controlled crossover trial of virtual reality in maintenance cardiovascular rehabilitation in a low-resource setting: impact on adherence, motivation, and engagement |
da Cruz MMA, Ricci-Vitor AL, Borges GLB, da Silva PF, Turri-Silva N, Takahashi C, Grace SL, Vanderlei LCM |
PTJ: Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal 2021 May;101(5):pzab071 |
clinical trial |
7/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of adding virtual reality (VR) to maintenance cardiac rehabilitation (CR); it was hypothesized to increase adherence, motivation, and engagement. METHODS: This study was a randomized, 1:1 concealed-allocation, single-blinded, 2 parallel-arm crossover trial. Blinded assessments were undertaken at baseline (mid-program), 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after baseline. The setting was a single CR program of unlimited duration in Brazil. Participants were patients with cardiovascular diseases or risk factors who had been in the program for >= 3 months. The CR program consisted of 3 supervised exercise sessions per week. In the VR arm, participants had 1 VR session of the 3 per week during the initial 12 weeks of the trial; this was withdrawn the subsequent 12 weeks. Measures were: program adherence (% of 3 sessions/week over 12 weeks; ascertained in all participants), motivation (Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire 3), and engagement (User Engagement Scale, adapted; vigor, dedication, and absorption subscales); all 3 were primary outcomes. RESULTS: Sixty-one (83.6%) patients were randomized (n = 30 to CR+VR); 54 (88.5%) were retained at 12 and 24 weeks. At baseline, participants had been in CR on average 7 years and had high engagement and motivation. CR+VR resulted in a significant increase in adherence at 12 weeks (baseline 72.87%; 12 weeks 82.80%), with significant reductions at 24 weeks when VR was withdrawn (65.48%); in the usual CR care arm, there were no changes over time. There was a significant effect for arm, with significantly higher adherence in the CR+VR arm than usual CR at 12 weeks (73.51%). Motivation decreased significantly from baseline to 12 weeks (4.32 (SD 0.37) versus 4.02 (SD 0.76)) and significantly increased from 12 to 24 weeks in the CR+VR arm (4.37 (SD 0.36)). Absorption was significantly lower at 12 weeks in the CR+VR arm (6.79 (SD 0.37) versus 6.20 (SD 1.01)). CONCLUSION: Although VR increased program adherence, interspersing it with usual CR sessions actually decreased patient motivation and absorption. IMPACT: Supplementing a maintenance CR program with VR using "exergames" resulted in significantly greater adherence (8% increase or 3/36 sessions), and this was quite a robust effect given it was extinguished with the removal of VR. However, contrary to hypotheses, offering 1 session of VR per week and 2 of usual CR exercise was related to lower motivation and absorption, which has implications for how clinicians design programs for this patient population.
|