Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Effects of inspiratory muscle training on walking capacity of individuals after stroke: a double-blind randomized trial [with consumer summary] |
de Oliveira Vaz L, de Carvalho Almeida J, dos Santos Oliveira Froes KS, Dias C, Pinto EB, Oliveira-Filho J |
Clinical Rehabilitation 2021 Sep;35(9):1247-1256 |
clinical trial |
6/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
OBJECTIVES: Identify the effects of inspiratory muscle training (IMT) on walking capacity, strength and inspiratory muscle endurance, activities of daily living, and quality of life poststroke. DESIGN: Double-blind randomized trial. SETTING: The Sarah Network of Rehabilitation Hospitals. SUBJECTS: Adult poststroke inpatients with inspiratory muscle weakness. INTERVENTIONS: The experimental group (EG) (n = 23) underwent IMT for 30 minutes/day, five times/week over six weeks. The control group (CG) (n = 27) performed sham IMT. Both groups underwent standard rehabilitation. MAIN MEASURES: Primary outcome was post-intervention six-minute walking test (6MWT) distance. We also measured maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), maximal expiratory pressure (MEP), inspiratory muscle endurance, activities of daily living (functional independence measure -- FIM), and quality of life at baseline and post-intervention. Three months after intervention, we measured MIP, walking capacity and quality of life. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar, with mean age 53 +/- 11 years and FIM 74 +/- 10 p. Both groups similarly increased the walking capacity at six weeks (63 versus 67 m, p = 0.803). Compared to the CG, the EG increased the inspiratory endurance (22 versus 7 cmH2O, p = 0.034) but there was no variation in MEP (14 versus 5 cmH2O, p = 0.102), MIP (27 versus 19 cmH2O, p = 0.164), FIM (6 versus 6, p = 0.966) or quality of life (0 versus 0.19, p = 0.493). Gains in both groups were sustained at three months. CONCLUSION: Adding IMT to a rehabilitation program improves inspiratory muscle endurance, but does not further improve MIP, 6-MWT distance, activities of daily living or quality of life of individuals after stroke beyond rehabilitation alone. Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03171272.
|