Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Incentives for uptake of and adherence to outpatient stroke rehabilitation services: a 3-arm randomized controlled trial
Matchar DB, Young SHY, Sim R, Yu CJY, Yan X, de Silva DA, Chakraborty B
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2022 Jan;103(1):1-7
clinical trial
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: No; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVE: To determine if rehabilitation uptake and adherence can be increased by providing coordinated transportation (increased convenience) and eliminating out-of-pocket costs (reduced expense). DESIGN: Three-arm randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Stroke units of 2 Singapore tertiary hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Singaporeans or permanent residents 21 years or older who were diagnosed as having stroke and were discharged home with physician's recommendation to continue outpatient rehabilitation (N = 266). INTERVENTIONS: A transportation Incentives arm (T), which provides free transportation services, a transportation and sessions incentives arm (T and S), offering free transportation and prescribed stroke rehabilitation sessions, and a control arm, education (E), consisting of a stroke rehabilitation educational program. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary study outcome was uptake of outpatient rehabilitation services (ORS) among patients poststroke and key predefined secondary outcomes being number of sessions attended and adherence to prescribed sessions. RESULTS: Uptake rate of ORS was 73.0% for E (confidence interval (CI) 63.8% to 82.3%), 81.8% for T (CI 73.8% to 89.8%), and 84.3% for T and S (CI 76.7% to 91.8%). Differences of T and T and S versus E were not statistically significant (p = 0.22 and p = 0.10, respectively). However, average number of rehabilitation sessions attended were significantly higher in both intervention arms: 5.50 +/- 7.65 for T and 7.51 +/- 9.52 for T and S versus 3.26 +/- 4.22 for control arm (E) (T versus E p = 0.017; T and S versus E p < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that persistence was higher for T and S compared with E (p = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: This study has demonstrated a possibility in increasing the uptake of and persistence to stroke ORS with free transportation and sessions. Incentivizing survivors of stroke to take up ORS is a new strategy worthy of further exploration for future policy change in financing ORS or other long-term care services.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help