Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Pedometer feedback interventions increase daily physical activity in phase III cardiac rehabilitation participants
Ozemek C, Strath SJ, Riggin K, Harber MP, Imboden MT, Kaminsky LA
Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention 2020 May;40(3):183-188
clinical trial
4/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

PURPOSE: To determine the effects of individually tailored interventions designed to increase physical activity (PA) in cardiac patients. METHODS: A total of 99 (77 men and 22 women, 61.5 +/- 10.7 yr) patients entering a phase III cardiac rehabilitation program completed a 12-wk PA intervention. Patients were randomized to usual care (UC, time-based recommendation), pedometer feedback (PF), newsletter-based motivational messaging (MM), or PF+MM. Both PF groups were given a goal of increasing steps/d by 10% of individual baseline value each week. If the goal for the week was not reached, the same goal was used for the next week. Physical activity was assessed for 7 d before beginning and after completing the program. The change in steps/d, moderate to vigorous intensity PA minutes, and sedentary time were compared among intervention groups. RESULTS: Average change in steps/d was found to be significantly greater (p < 0.01) in the PF (2,957 +/- 3,185) and the PF+MM (3,150 +/- 3,007) compared with UC (264 +/- 2,065) and MM (718 +/- 2,415) groups. No group experienced changes in moderate to vigorous intensity PA time and only the PF intervention group decreased sedentary time (baseline 470.2 +/- 77.1 to postintervention 447.8 +/- 74.9 min/d, p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: The findings from this study demonstrate that using PF was superior to the usual time-based PA recommendations and to newsletter-based MM in patients starting a phase III CR program. Cardiac rehabilitation programs are encouraged to implement PA feedback with individualized PA goals in order to support the increase in PA.
For more information on this journal, please visit http://www.lww.com.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help