Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Efficacy and safety of treating chronic nonspecific low back pain with radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT), rESWT combined with celecoxib and eperisone (C plus E) or C plus E alone: a prospective, randomized trial
Guo X, Li L, Yan Z, Li Y, Peng Z, Yang Y, Zhang Y, Schmitz C, Feng Z
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 2021 Dec 4;16(705):Epub
clinical trial
8/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

BACKGROUND: To investigate whether respectively radial extracoporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT) or a combination of rESWT, celecoxib and eperisone (rESWT+C+E) are superior in reducing pain in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain (cnsLBP) compared to C+E alone (a standard treatment of this condition in China). METHODS: 140 patients with cnsLBP were randomly allocated to rESWT (n = 47), rESWT+C+E (n = 45) or C+E alone (n = 48) for four weeks between November 2017 and March 2019. Outcome was evaluated using the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ), Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire and Patient Health Questionnaire 9, collected at baseline as well as one week (W1), W2, W3, W4 and W12 after baseline. RESULTS: All scores showed a statistically significant improvement over time. The PSEQ and NRS scores showed a significant Time x Treatment effect. Patients treated with rESWT had significantly lower mean NRS values than patients treated with rESWT+C+E at W1 and W3, as well as than patients treated with C+E alone at W3 and W4. No severe adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: rESWT may not be inferior to respectively rESWT+C+E or C+E alone in reducing pain in patients with cnsLBP. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, prospective, randomized, active-controlled trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT03337607. Registered November 09, 2017, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03337607. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I; prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help