Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Effects of neurodynamic interventions on pain sensitivity and function in patients with multiple sclerosis: a randomized clinical trial [with consumer summary] |
de Dios Perez-Bruzon J, Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C, Cleland JA, Plaza-Manzano G, Ortega-Santiago R |
Physiotherapy 2022 Jun;115:36-45 |
clinical trial |
7/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of adding a neurodynamic intervention into a multimodal management approach in individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) with upper extremity pain symptoms. DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial. SETTING: Tertiary hospital center. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-two individuals with MS were randomly assigned to multimodal usual care alone (n = 16) or multimodal usual care plus neurodynamic intervention (n = 16). INTERVENTIONS: Both groups received 5 sessions of multimodal usual care of 30minutes duration, twice per week. Subjects allocated to the neurodynamic group also received bilateral neurodynamic slider interventions targeting the upper extremity nerve trunks. OUTCOME MEASURES: Pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) at the radial, median and ulnar nerve trunks, second metacarpal and tibialis anterior, pain intensity in the upper extremity (NPRS, 0 to 10), light touch detection threshold (von Frey hairs) and manual dexterity (nine-hole peg test) were assessed before and after the intervention. RESULTS: Subjects receiving the neurodynamic interventions experienced larger improvements in PPTs at all locations (moderate effect size, between-groups differences from 89.5 to 186.5kPa), a higher decrease in pain intensity at rest (large effect, difference 1.7, 95%CI 0.4 to 3.0) and improvements in sensitivity to light touch (moderate effect, difference -0.7, 95%CI -1.3 to -0.1) and in manual dexterity (large effect, difference 7.7, 95%CI 4.0 to 11.4 seconds) than those that did not receive the neurodynamic intervention. CONCLUSIONS: The inclusion of neural mobilization into a multimodal management approach resulted in reduction of pressure sensitivity, greater reduction in pain and improvement in sensitivity to light touch and manual dexterity in MS. Further studies are necessary to confirm these findings at longer term follow-ups. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03595631.
|