BACKGROUND: Stroke is a major cause of disability with mainly affecting trunk mobility and function. The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of core stabilization exercises versus conventional therapy on trunk mobility, function, ambulation, and quality of life of stroke patients. DESIGN: Assessor blinded randomized control trial. SETTING: Ibrahim polyclinic-Shadman, Ch Muhammad Akram teaching hospital-Raiwind, Rasheed hospital-Defence. SUBJECTS: Chronic ischemic stroke patients. INTERVENTION: Control group (n = 21) underwent conventional treatment for stroke for 40 min/day, 5 times/week for 8 weeks. Experimental group (n = 20) received core stability training for additional 15 min along with conventional treatment. MAIN MEASURES: Main outcome measures were Trunk impairment scale (TIS), functional ambulation category (FAC), stroke specific quality of life (SSQOL) and trunk range of motion (ROM). RESULTS: The differences between the control group and experimental group post-treatment were statistically significant for trunk impairment, functional ambulation, quality of life, and frontal plane trunk motion (p-value < 0.05) with higher mean values for core stabilization training. The frontal plane trunk mobility and rotation showed non-significant differences post-treatment (p-value > 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study concluded that core stabilization training is better as compared to the conventional physical therapy treatment for improving trunk impairments, functional ambulation and quality of life among patients of stroke. The core stabilization training is also more effective in improving trunk mobility in sagittal plane. This study is registered in Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials IRCT20210614051578N1 and was approved by the local research ethics committee of Riphah International University.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help

• PubMed Central
• DOI
• PubMed
• PDF locator
• publisher