Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

The efficacy of Kinesio Taping on lymphedema following head and neck cancer therapy: a randomized, double blind, sham-controlled trial
Atar S, Atar Y, Uygan U, Karaketir SG, Kumral TL, Sari H, Karaketir S, Kuru O
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 2023;39(9):1932-1846
clinical trial
8/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: Yes; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to investigate the effectiveness of Kinesio Taping for lymphedema following head and neck cancer therapy and its effect on patient compliance and quality of life. METHODS: A total of 66 patients with lymphedema following head and neck cancer therapy were randomly allocated to the therapeutic Kinesio taping group (n = 33) and the sham Kinesio Taping group (n = 33). All participants received manual lymphatic drainage, Kinesio Taping, and home exercises for the first four weeks, and only home exercises for the second four weeks. The tape measurements, a scale of external lymphedema, a scale of the internal lymphedema, and quality of life were evaluated in both groups. The perceived discomfort consisting of limitation of daily living activities, pain, tightness, stiffness, and heaviness were also recorded. RESULTS: When the group x time effect was evaluated, it was observed that external lymphedema was significantly reduced in both groups according to neck and face composite measurements (p < 0.001). However, in these measurements, a significant difference was found between the groups in favor of the KT group (p = 0.001, p = 0.032, respectively). At the end of the study, there was no significant difference in terms of internal lymphedema in both groups (p = 0.860). The quality of life parameters such as global health status and swallowing were significantly better in the Kinesio taping group (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the parameters of perceived discomfort between the two groups (p = 0.282, p = 0.225, p = 0.090, p = 0.155, p = 0.183, respectively). CONCLUSION: Kinesio Taping is effective in tape measurements and positively affects the quality of life in lymphedema following head and neck cancer therapy.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help