Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Cardiovascular responses to high-intensity stair climbing in individuals with coronary artery disease
Valentino SE, Dunford EC, Dubberley J, Lonn EM, Gibala MJ, Phillips SM, MacDonald MJ
Physiological Reports 2022 May;10(10):e15308
clinical trial
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation leads to improvements in cardiovascular function in individuals with coronary artery disease. The cardiac effects of coronary artery disease (CAD) can be quantified using clinical echocardiographic measures, such as ejection fraction (EF). Measures of cardiovascular function typically only used in research settings can provide additional information and maybe more sensitive indices to assess changes after exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation. These additional measures include endothelial function (measured by flow-mediated dilation), left ventricular twist, myocardial performance index, and global longitudinal strain. To investigate the cardiovascular response to 12 week of either traditional moderate-intensity (TRAD) or stair climbing-based high-intensity interval (STAIR) exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation using both clinical and additional measures of cardiovascular function in individuals with CAD. Measurements were made at baseline (BL) and after supervised (4 weeks) and unsupervised (12 weeks) of training. This study was registered as a clinical trial at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03235674). Participants were randomized into either TRAD (n = 9, 8M/1F) and STAIR (n = 9, 8M/1F). There was a training-associated increase in one component of left ventricular twist: Cardiac apical rotation (TRAD: BL: 5.6 +/- 3.3, 4 week: 8.0 +/- 3.9, 12 week: 6.2 +/- 5.1 and STAIR: BL: 5.1 +/- 3.6, 4 week: 7.4 +/- 3.9, 12 week: 7.8 +/- 2.8, p (time) = 0.03, eta2 = 0.20; main effect) and post-hoc analysis revealed a difference between BL and 4 week (p = 0.02). There were no changes in any other clinical or additional measures of cardiovascular function. The small increase in cardiac apical rotation observed after 4 weeks of training may indicate an early change in cardiac function. A larger overall training stimulus may be needed to elicit other cardiovascular function changes.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help