Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Effectiveness of a preschool asthma education programme, compared to usual care, on the frequency of acute asthma events: a community-based cluster randomised trial |
Walker N, von Blaramberg T, Mackay J, McNaughton W, Strickland J, Van Mil J, Moorcroft J, Funnell C, Smith L, Bettle E, Power K, Parore M, Parag V, Bullen C, Springford Metcalfe S |
New Zealand Medical Journal 2022 May 6;135(1554):80-92 |
clinical trial |
6/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
AIM: To determine whether an asthma intervention delivered within preschools can improve asthma outcomes in children aged 2 to 5 years with asthma or a high probability of asthma. METHODS: Between 2011 and 2013, we undertook a pragmatic, single-blind, cluster randomised trial in Auckland, New Zealand. We randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) preschools, and their children aged 2 to 5 years with asthma or a high probability of asthma, to receive an asthma intervention (a 12-month respiratory nurse-led asthma assessment using an evidence-based, web-based tool and a class-based asthma education programme for four months), or a control intervention (a class-based science education programme for four months). Both groups received standard asthma management by their primary care physician. The primary outcome was the proportion of children that had at least one unscheduled ("urgent") medical or ED attendance for asthma over 12 months. RESULTS: We randomised 171 preschools, 85 to the intervention (341 children) and 86 to the control (334 children). We found no difference in the primary outcome (intervention: 216/341, 63% versus control: 181/334, 54%: adjusted odds ratio 1.36, 95% Confidence Interval 0.95 to 1.94, p = 0.095). However, compared with the control group, the intervention group had improved and sustained asthma control and fewer asthma symptoms over 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Combining asthma education with a nurse-led, evidence-based asthma assessment and education intervention led to sustained improvements in asthma control in this preschool population, but its effect on acute events remains unclear.
|