Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Effect of sustained natural apophyseal glides on stiffness of lumbar stabilizer muscles in patients with nonspecific low back pain: randomized controlled trial [with consumer summary]
Buran CY, Yurdaisik I, Elbasi ND, Tutuneken YE, Koce K, Cinar B
Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 2021 Jul-Aug;44(6):445-454
clinical trial
8/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: Yes; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the immediate effect of Mulligan sustained natural apophyseal glides (SNAGs) on muscular stiffness by using ultrasound shear wave elastography, pain, and function in patients with nonspecific low back pain. METHODS: In a prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blinded study, 30 participants with nonspecific low back pain were randomly divided into 2 groups: a real SNAG group (aged 21.0 +/- 1.7, 5 men, 10 women) and sham SNAG group (aged 20.4 +/- 0.5, 4 men, 11 women). Muscular stiffness of the multifidus and erector spinal muscles with ultrasound shear wave elastography, visual analog scale, the sit and reach, flamingo balance, the functional reach, side bridge, and Biering-Sorensen tests were made before and immediately after intervention. The Oswestry Disability Index score was recorded only baseline. RESULTS: After intervention, the change in visual analog scale, sit and reach, Biering-Sorensen, and side bridge tests scores were significantly different between real SNAG and sham SNAG groups (p < 0.05), but there was no significant difference in functional reach and flamingo balance test scores between the groups (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference for all measurements between pre- and post-intervention in sham SNAG group (p > 0.05). There was a significant reduction in muscular stiffness in the real SNAG group. But there was no change in muscular stiffness between pre- and postintervention in the sham group (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that the Mulligan SNAG technique had a positive effect on pain severity, flexibility, trunk muscle endurance, and muscle stiffness in patients with nonspecific LBP.
Reprinted from the Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics with copyright permission from the National University of Health Sciences.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help