Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Effect of lower- versus higher-intensity isometric handgrip training in adults with hypertension: a randomized controlled trial
Javidi M, Ahmadizad S, Argani H, Najafi A, Ebrahim K, Salehi N, Javidi Y, Pescatello LS, Jowhari A, Hackett DA
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease 2022 Aug 30;9(9):287
clinical trial
7/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

This study compared the effects of lower- versus higher-intensity isometric handgrip exercise on resting blood pressure (BP) and associated clinical markers in adults with hypertension. Thirty-nine males were randomly assigned to one of three groups, including isometric handgrip at 60% maximal voluntary contraction (IHG-60), isometric handgrip at 30% IHG-30, or a control group (CON) that had been instructed to continue with their current activities of daily living. The volume was equated between the exercise groups, with IHG-60 performing 8 x 30-s contractions and IHG-30 performing 4 x 2-min contractions. Training was performed three times per week for 8 weeks. Resting BP (median (IQR)), flow-mediated dilation, heart rate variability, and serum markers of inflammation and oxidative stress were measured pre- and post-intervention. Systolic BP was significantly reduced for IHG-60 (-15.5 mmHg (-18.75 to -7.25)) and IHG-30 (-5.0 mmHg (-7.5 to -3.5)) compared to CON (p < 0.01), but no differences were observed between both the exercise groups. A greater reduction in diastolic BP was observed for IHG-60 (-5.0 mmHg (-6.0 to -4.25) compared to IHG-30 (-2.0 mmHg (-2.5 to -2.0), p = 0.042), and for both exercise groups compared to CON (p < 0.05). Flow-mediated dilation increased for both exercise groups versus CON (p < 0.001). IHG-30 had greater reductions in interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha compared to the other groups (p < 0.05) and CON (p = 0.018), respectively. There was a reduction in Endothelin-1 for IHG-60 compared to CON (p = 0.018). Both the lower- and higher-intensity IHG training appear to be associated with reductions in resting BP and improvements in clinical markers of inflammation and oxidative stress.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help