Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
| Effects on sedentary behaviour of an approach to reduce sedentary behaviour in patients with minor ischaemic stroke: a randomised controlled trial [with consumer summary] |
| Ashizawa R, Honda H, Take K, Yoshizawa K, Kameyama Y, Yoshimoto Y |
| Clinical Rehabilitation 2022 Nov;37(4):545-556 |
| clinical trial |
| 4/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
|
OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects on sedentary behaviour of an approach that promotes reduction in sedentary behaviour in patients with minor ischaemic stroke after intervention and at follow-up. DESIGN: A randomised controlled trial. SETTING: During hospitalisation and after hospital discharge. SUBJECTS: In total, 86 patients with minor ischaemic stroke admitted to an acute care hospital were assigned to the intervention (n = 43) and control (n = 43) groups. INTERVENTION: An intervention group that received an approach to reduce sedentary behaviour upon hospital admission until 3 months after discharge (education, self-monitoring, phone calls, etc) and a control group that received the usual care during hospitalisation. From 3 to 6 months after discharge, no group received any intervention. MAIN OUTCOME: The primary outcome was the change (%) in sedentary behaviour from baseline to post-intervention (3 months after discharge) and follow-up (6 months after discharge). Sedentary behaviour was measured at baseline (upon hospital admission), post-intervention, and at follow-up using accelerometers. RESULTS: At the post-intervention stage, the intervention group showed a significantly greater change in sedentary behaviour from baseline than that shown by the control group (sedentary behaviour: intervention group, -22.7%; control group, -14.9%; p = 0.013; effect size = 0.58). At follow-up too, the intervention group showed a significantly greater change in sedentary behaviour from baseline than that shown by the control group (sedentary behaviour: intervention group, -20.4%; control group, -13.6%; p = 0.025; effect size = 0.54). CONCLUSIONS: An approach to reduce sedentary behaviour in patients with minor ischaemic stroke effectively reduces sedentary behaviour, which is sustained up to follow-up.
|