Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Effects on sedentary behaviour of an approach to reduce sedentary behaviour in patients with minor ischaemic stroke: a randomised controlled trial [with consumer summary] |
Ashizawa R, Honda H, Take K, Yoshizawa K, Kameyama Y, Yoshimoto Y |
Clinical Rehabilitation 2022 Nov;37(4):545-556 |
clinical trial |
4/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects on sedentary behaviour of an approach that promotes reduction in sedentary behaviour in patients with minor ischaemic stroke after intervention and at follow-up. DESIGN: A randomised controlled trial. SETTING: During hospitalisation and after hospital discharge. SUBJECTS: In total, 86 patients with minor ischaemic stroke admitted to an acute care hospital were assigned to the intervention (n = 43) and control (n = 43) groups. INTERVENTION: An intervention group that received an approach to reduce sedentary behaviour upon hospital admission until 3 months after discharge (education, self-monitoring, phone calls, etc) and a control group that received the usual care during hospitalisation. From 3 to 6 months after discharge, no group received any intervention. MAIN OUTCOME: The primary outcome was the change (%) in sedentary behaviour from baseline to post-intervention (3 months after discharge) and follow-up (6 months after discharge). Sedentary behaviour was measured at baseline (upon hospital admission), post-intervention, and at follow-up using accelerometers. RESULTS: At the post-intervention stage, the intervention group showed a significantly greater change in sedentary behaviour from baseline than that shown by the control group (sedentary behaviour: intervention group, -22.7%; control group, -14.9%; p = 0.013; effect size = 0.58). At follow-up too, the intervention group showed a significantly greater change in sedentary behaviour from baseline than that shown by the control group (sedentary behaviour: intervention group, -20.4%; control group, -13.6%; p = 0.025; effect size = 0.54). CONCLUSIONS: An approach to reduce sedentary behaviour in patients with minor ischaemic stroke effectively reduces sedentary behaviour, which is sustained up to follow-up.
|