Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Multimedia instructions for motor control exercises in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain [with consumer summary]
Berberoglu U, Ulger O
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation 2023 Feb;32(4):424-432
clinical trial
7/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) is one of the top 3 diseases that may lead to disability. Current treatment guidelines define exercise as a first-line treatment for nonspecific LBP (NSLBP). There are various evidence-based exercise approaches for treating NSLBP, and many of them include motor control principles. Motor control exercises (MCEs) are better than general exercises that do not include motor control principles. Many patients find learning these exercises complex and challenging, in that MCE exercises have no standard teaching method. The researchers of this study developed multimedia instructions for an MCE program to make teaching MCE easier; thus, more effective. METHODS: The participants were randomized into multimedia or standard (face-to-face) instruction groups. We applied the same treatments to both groups at the same dosage. The only differences between groups were the exercise instruction methods. The multimedia group learned MCE from multimedia videos; the control group learned MCE from a physiotherapist with face-to-face instructions. Treatment lasted 8 weeks. We evaluated patients' exercise adherence with Exercise Adherence Rating Scale (EARS), pain with the Visual Analog Scale, and disability with Oswestry Disability Index. Evaluations were made before and after treatment. Follow-up evaluations were carried out 4 weeks after the end of treatment. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant interaction between the group and time on pain, F[2,56] = 0.068, p = 0.935, partial eta2 = 0.002 and Oswestry Disability Index scores, F[2,56] = 0.951, p = 0.393, partial eta2 = 0.033. Also, there was no statistically significant interaction between the group and time on Exercise Adherence Rating Scale total scores F[1,20] = 2.343, p = 0.142, partial eta2 = 0.105. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that multimedia instructions for MCE have similar effects to standard (face-to-face) instructions on pain, disability, and exercise adherence in patients with NSLBP. To our knowledge, with these results, the developed multimedia instructions became the first free, evidence-based instructions that have objective progression criteria and a Creative Commons license.
Copyright Human Kinetics. Reprinted with permission from Human Kinetics (Champaign, IL).

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help