Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Efficacy of constraint-induced movement therapy versus bimanual intensive training on motor and psychosocial outcomes in children with unilateral cerebral palsy: a randomized trial [with consumer summary]
Liang K-J, Chen H-L, Huang C-W, Wang T-N
The American Journal of Occupational Therapy 2023 Jul;77(4):7704205030
clinical trial
6/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

IMPORTANCE: Emerging research has demonstrated that constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) and bimanual intensive training (BIT) show promising effectiveness for children with unilateral cerebral palsy (UCP). Considering that neurorehabilitative programs have always been designed with long training periods, psychosocial outcomes have received scarce attention and thus have not been investigated sufficiently. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of CIMT and BIT with 36-hr interventional dosages for both motor and psychosocial outcomes. DESIGN: Randomized trial. SETTING: Community. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-eight children with UCP, ages 6 to 12 yr. INTERVENTION: Both CIMT and BIT delivered via individual intervention for 2.25 hr/day, twice a week, for 8 wk. OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The Melbourne Assessment 2, Pediatric Motor Activity Log-Revised, Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, ABILHAND-Kids measure, and Parenting Stress Index-Short Form were administrated at pretreatment, midterm, posttreatment, and 6 mo after intervention. An engagement questionnaire for investigating the child's engagement in the intervention was used to collect the perspectives of the children and the parents weekly. RESULTS: Children with UCP who received either CIMT or BIT achieved similar motor improvements. The only difference was that CIMT yielded larger improvements in frequency and quality of use of the more affected hand at the 6-mo follow-up. Similar child engagement and parental stress levels were found in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study comprehensively compared the efficacy of motor and psychosocial outcomes for 36-hr dosages of CIMT and BIT. The promising findings support the clinical efficacy and feasibility of the proposed protocols.
Copyright by the Amerrican Occupational Therapy Association Inc. Reprinted with permission.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help