Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Long-Term Outcomes of Exercise Therapy Versus Revascularization in Patients With Intermittent Claudication
Shirasu T, Takagi H, Yasuhara J, Kuno T, Kent KC, Farivar BS, Tracci MC, Clouse WD
Annals of surgery 2023 Aug;278(2):172-178
systematic review

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to analyze the risk of progression to chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI), amputation and subsequent interventions after revascularization versus non-invasive therapy in patients with intermittent claudication (IC). BACKGROUND: Conflicting evidence exists regarding adverse limb outcomes after each treatment strategy. METHODS: PRISMA guidelines were followed. MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched aided by a health sciences librarian through August 16, 2022. Randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing invasive (endovascular or surgical revascularization) and non-invasive treatment (exercise and/or medical treatment) were included. PROSPERO registration was completed (CRD42022352831). RESULTS: A total of 9 RCTs comprising 1477 patients (invasive, 765 patients; non-invasive, 712 patients) were eligible. During a mean of 3.6 year follow-up, progression to CLTI after invasive (5 (2 to 8) per 1,000 person-years) and non-invasive treatment (6 (3 to 10) per 1,000 person-years) were not statistically different (rate ratio (RR), 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.35 to 1.69, p = 0.51, I2 0%). Incidence of amputation (RR, 1.69, 95% CI 0.54 to 5.26, p = 0.36, I2 0%) and all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 1.26, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.74, p = 0.16, I2 0%) also did not differ between the groups. However, the invasive treatment group underwent significantly more revascularizations (RR, 4.15, 95% CI 2.80 to 6.16, p < 0.00001, I2 83%). Results were not changed by fixed effect or random-effects models, nor by sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Although there is equivalent risk of progression to CLTI, major amputation and all-cause mortality compared to non-invasive treatment, invasive treatment for patients with IC led to significantly more revascularization procedures and should be used selectively in patients with major lifestyle limitation. Guideline recommendation of non-invasive treatment for first-line IC therapy is supported.
For more information on this journal, please visit http://www.lww.com.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help