Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Which remote rehabilitation interventions work best for chronic musculoskeletal pain and depression? A Bayesian network meta-analysis [with consumer summary]
Bobos P, Pereira TV, Pouliopoulou DV, Charakopoulou-Travlou M, Nazari G, MacDermid JC
The Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy 2024 Jun;54(6):361-376
systematic review

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of remote rehabilitation interventions for people living with chronic musculoskeletal pain and depression. DESIGN: A systematic review with network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials. LITERATURE SEARCH: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, EMBASE, LILACS MEDLINE, PSYNDEX, and PsycINFO databases from inception to May 2023. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials that evaluated the effectiveness of remote rehabilitation interventions in people with chronic musculoskeletal pain and depression. DATA SYNTHESIS: We used Bayesian random-effects models for the NMA. Effect estimates were comparisons between rehabilitation interventions and waitlist. We performed a sensitivity analysis based on bias in the randomization process, large trials (>= 100 patients per arm) and musculoskeletal condition. RESULTS: Fifty-eight randomized controlled trials involving 10 278 participants (median sample size 137; interquartile range (IQR) 77 to 236) were included. Interactive voice response cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT); standardized mean difference (SMD) -0.66. 95% credible interval (CrI) -1.17 to -0.16), CBT in person (SMD -0.50, 95% CrI -0.97 to -0.04), and mobile app CBT plus exercise (SMD -0.37, 95% CrI -0.69 to -0.02) were superior to waitlist at 12 week follow-up for reducing pain (>= 98% probability of superiority). For depression outcomes, Internet-delivered CBT and telecare were superior to waitlist at 12 week follow-up (SMD -0.51, 95% CrI -0.87 to -0.13) (>= 99% probability of superiority). For pain outcomes, the certainty of evidence ranged from low to moderate. For depression outcomes, the certainty of evidence ranged from very low to moderate. The proportion of dropouts attributed to adverse events was unclear. No intervention was associated with higher odds of dropout. CONCLUSION: Interactive voice response CBT and mobile app CBT plus exercise showed similar treatment effects with in-person CBT on pain reduction among people living with chronic musculoskeletal pain and depression had over 98% probability of superiority than waitlist control at 12 week follow-up. Internet-delivered CBT and telecare had over 99% probability of superiority than waitlist control for improving depression outcomes at 12 week follow-up.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help