Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Effects of upper limb exercise or training on hand dexterity and function in people with Parkinson disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis [with consumer summary]
Proud EL, Miller KJ, Morris ME, McGinley JL, Blennerhassett JM
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2024 Jul;105(7):1375-1387
systematic review

There is moderate certainty that exercise or training can improve hand dexterity. Observed benefits are small and may not be clinically meaningful. Task specificity may be an important component when designing effective treatments. This systematic review investigated the effects of exercise and training on hand dexterity and function outcomes in people with Parkinson disease (PD). We searched 5 databases (MEDLINE Ovid, CINAHL, PEDro, PubMed, Cochrane Database) from inception to October 2022. Included studies were randomized controlled trials delivering upper limb exercise or training interventions to people with PD and evaluating 1 or more upper limb activity outcomes. Two independent reviewers screened 668 articles for inclusion. Two reviewers independently extracted data relating to study participants, intervention characteristics, and key outcomes. Cochrane Risk of Bias and GRADE tools assessed methodological quality of included studies, and strength of evidence for 3 outcomes: hand dexterity, self-reported hand function, and handwriting performance. Meta-analyses synthesized results for within-hand dexterity and self-reported function. Eighteen randomized controlled trials (n = 704) with low to unclear risk of bias were identified. Experimental interventions varied considerably in their approach and treatment dose, and 3 studies focused on training handwriting. Meta-analysis showed moderate quality evidence of a small positive effect on within-hand dexterity (SMD 0.26; 95% CI 0.07 to 0.44). Very low-quality evidence pointed toward a nonsignificant effect on self-reported hand function (SMD 0.67; 95% CI -0.40 to 1.75). A narrative review of handwriting interventions showed low quality evidence for improved performance after training. There is moderate certainty of evidence supporting the use of exercise and training to address dexterity problems, but evidence remains unclear for self-reported hand function and handwriting. Our findings suggest that training could employ task-related approaches. Future research should interrogate aspects of clinical practice such as optimal dose and key ingredients for effective interventions.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help