Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Training intensity of robot-assisted gait training in children with cerebral palsy [with consumer summary] |
Choi JY, Jin LH, Jeon MS, Kim MH, Yang S-S, Sohn MK |
Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 2024 Aug;66(8):1096-1105 |
clinical trial |
6/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
AIM: We compared three different intensities of robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) for achieving favourable outcomes in children with cerebral palsy (CP). METHOD: This study was conducted using a randomized controlled, single-blind design. Thirty children (19 males and 11 females; mean age 6 years 1 month, SD 2 years) with CP classified in Gross Motor Function Classification System levels II and III were assigned to three different RAGT intensity groups: high-intensity (fastest walking speed and lowest body weight support (BWS)), low-intensity (slowest speed and highest BWS), and comfortable intensity (intermediate speed and intermediate BWS). The RAGT intervention was performed three times a week for 6 weeks. Outcome measures included the 88-item Gross Motor Function Measure, stability index, spatiotemporal parameters of gait analysis, paediatric functional independence measure, and the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. RESULTS: The 88-item Gross Motor Function Measure was significantly improved after training in the high-intensity (D delta 8.3 +/- 15.6; E delta 3.8 +/- 4.1) and comfortable intensity (D delta 2.9 +/- 3.1; E delta 1.2 +/- 2.0) groups, whereas gait speed was improved in the comfortable intensity group, without statistically significant group differences. Only the low-intensity group showed improvement on the stability index (delta -0.6 +/- 0.9, p = 0.05). Everyday functional performance significantly improved in all three groups, with the comfortable intensity group showing the greatest improvement. INTERPRETATION: Different training intensities produced improvement in different areas; individualized RAGT intensity adjustment is therefore needed based on the rehabilitation goal.
|