Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Supervised exercise for patients with metastatic breast cancer: a cost-utility analysis alongside the PREFERABLE-EFFECT randomized controlled trial [with consumer summary] |
Schouten AEM, Hiensch AE, Frederix GWJ, Monninkhof EM, Schmidt ME, Clauss D, Gunasekara N, Belloso J, Trevaskis M, Rundqvist H, Wiskemann J, Muller J, Sweegers MG, Fremd C, Altena R, Bijlsma RM, Sonke G, Lahuerta A, Mann GB, Francis PA, Richardson G, Malter W, Kufel-Grabowska J, van der Wall E, Aaronson NK, Senkus E, Urruticoechea A, Zopf EM, Bloch W, Stuiver MM, Wengstrom Y, Steindorf K, van der Meulen MP, May AM |
Journal of Clinical Oncology 2025 Apr 10;43(11):1325-1336 |
clinical trial |
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
Copyright release for this abstract has not been granted.
|