Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Low-level laser therapy does not aid the management of tennis elbow |
Papadopoulos ES, Smith RW, Cawley MID, Mani R |
Clinical Rehabilitation 1996 Feb;10(1):9-11 |
clinical trial |
6/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: No; Blind subjects: Yes; Blind therapists: Yes; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: No. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
The value of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) as a therapy for painful tennis elbow is dubious since evidence for its efficacy is conflicting. This report presents the results of a randomized, double-blind, controlled study on patients with tennis elbow (n = 29) using a gallium aluminium arsenide laser. Two different methods of assessing pain, visual analogue scores and a Marcy Wedge Pro exerciser, were used. No significant differences were found between the treatment and placebo groups. This suggests that LLLT at the dosage and duratiion used in this study is without benefit in the short-term management of painful tennis elbow.
|