Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Inhalation therapy in asthma: nebulizer or pressurized metered-dose inhaler with holding chamber? In vivo comparison of lung deposition in children
Wildhaber JH, Dore ND, Wilson JM, Devadason SG, LeSouef PN
The Journal of Pediatrics 1999 Jul;135(1):28-33
clinical trial
4/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: No; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVE: To compare lung deposition from a nebulizer and a pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI)/holding chamber to determine their efficiency in aerosol delivery to children. STUDY DESIGN: Children with stable asthma (n = 17) aged 2 to 9 years inhaled in random order radiolabeled salbutamol from a nebulizer and a pMDI through a nonstatic holding chamber. Body and lung deposition of radiolabeled salbutamol was assessed with a gamma camera. RESULTS: Mean (absolute dose) total lung deposition expressed as a percentage of the nebulized dose was 5.4% (108 microg) in younger children (< 4 years) and 11.1% (222 microg) in older children (> 4 years). Mean (absolute dose) total lung deposition expressed as a percentage of the metered dose was 5.4% (21.6 microg) in younger and 9.6% (38.4 microg) in older children. CONCLUSIONS: For the same age groups we have shown equivalent percentages of total lung deposition of radiolabeled salbutamol aerosolized by either a nebulizer or a pMDI/holding chamber. However, the delivery rate per minute and the total dose of salbutamol deposited were significantly higher for the nebulizer.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help