Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Randomised controlled trial of an occupational therapy intervention to increase outdoor mobility after stroke [with consumer summary]
Logan PA, Gladman JR, Avery A, Walker MF, Dyas J, Groom L
BMJ 2004 Dec 11;329(7479):1372-1375
clinical trial
7/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate an occupational therapy intervention to improve outdoor mobility after stroke. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. SETTING: General practice registers, social services departments, a primary care rehabilitation service, and a geriatric day hospital. PARTICIPANTS: 168 community dwelling people with a clinical diagnosis of stroke in previous 36 months: 86 were allocated to the intervention group and 82 to the control group. INTERVENTIONS: Leaflets describing local transport services for disabled people (control group) and leaflets with assessment and up to seven intervention sessions by an occupational therapist (intervention group). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Responses to postal questionnaires at four and 10 months: primary outcome measure was response to whether participant got out of the house as much as he or she would like, and secondary outcome measures were response to how many journeys outdoors had been made in the past month and scores on the Nottingham extended activities of daily living scale, Nottingham leisure questionnaire, and general health questionnaire. RESULTS: Participants in the treatment group were more likely to get out of the house as often as they wanted at both four months (relative risk 1.72, 95% confidence interval 1.25 to 2.37) and 10 months (1.74, 1.24 to 2.44). The treatment group reported more journeys outdoors in the month before assessment at both four months (median 37 in intervention group, 14 in control group: p < 0.01) and 10 months (median 42 in intervention group, 14 in control group: p < 0.01). At four months the mobility scores on the Nottingham extended activities of daily living scale were significantly higher in the intervention group, but there were no significant differences in the other secondary outcomes. No significant differences were observed in these measures at 10 months. CONCLUSION: A targeted occupational therapy intervention at home increases outdoor mobility in people after stroke.
Reproduced with permission from the BMJ Publishing Group.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help