Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

A prospective outcome study of rehabilitation programs and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
Schenck RC Jr, Blaschak MJ, Lance ED, Turturro TC, Holmes CF
Arthroscopy 1997 Jun;13(3):285-290
clinical trial
4/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: No; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: No; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

We evaluated the outcome of and compared two rehabilitation programs (clinic-based versus home) after a mid-third patellar autograft reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Thirty-seven patients (28 male, 9 female; average age 24.1 years) completed the study. Fifteen of these patients received clinic-based rehabilitation (three visits per week for 6 weeks prescribed), and 22 patients received home-based physical therapy (number of visits determined by patient response). Knee ROM, Lysholm, visual analogy scale (VAS) pain rating, hop test, KT-1000, and Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively. All patients reported good satisfaction with the function of their knee at average follow-up of 21.6 months (range 12 to 48). Patients managed by home rehabilitation averaged 2.85 visits as compared with 14.2 for clinic-centered patient (p < 0.05). There were no differences in functional or subjective outcomes in the different postoperative rehabilitation regimens, with both groups reporting high satisfaction and improved quality of life. Cost savings in the home rehabilitation group were significant.
Copyright by Arthroscopy Association of North America.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help