Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Is pulsed shortwave diathermy better than ice therapy for the reduction of oedema following calcaneal fractures? Preliminary trial [with consumer summary]
Buzzard BM, Pratt RK, Briggs PJ, Siddique MS, Tasker A, Robinson S
Physiotherapy 2003 Dec;89(12):734-742
clinical trial
2/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: No; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: No; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Ice therapy (CRYOCUFF) is used to reduce oedema after calcaneal fractures. Pulsed shortwave diathermy would have to be more effective to justify its extra cost. This pilot study investigated the efficacy of pulsed shortwave diathermy and CRYOCUFF for oedema reduction following calcaneal fractures. METHODS: A prospective trial of patients presenting with acute calcaneal fractures, recruited over a two-year period. Malleolar, calcaneal and forefoot circumference, and ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion and subtalar inversion and eversion were measured daily. RESULTS: Of 55 patients, 20 with unilateral fractures were allocated alternately to either ice therapy or pulsed shortwave diathermy and complete data were collected over five days. Maximum swelling reduction was 1.36 cm (range 0.3 cm increase to 5.2 cm decrease) around the calcaneum (p < 0.001) and ankle dorsiflexion/plantarflexion range of movement increased by 25 degrees (range 5 degrees to 55 degrees, p < 0.001). Pulsed shortwave diathermy was not found to be substantially more effective than CRYOCUFF within the limits of this study. CONCLUSIONS: A significant improvement in movement occurred over the five-day follow-up period in all patients, but no difference was found between the treatment groups. There was no clinically important improvement in swelling over the five days in either group. The CRYOCUFF is less expensive, easier to use and portable, and remains the favoured method of treatment of oedema following calcaneal fractures in this unit.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help