Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
A randomized controlled trial of high versus low intensity weight training versus general practitioner care for clinical depression in older adults |
Singh NA, Stavrinos TM, Scarbek Y, Galambos G, Liber C, Fiatarone Singh MA |
The Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 2005 Jun;60(6):768-776 |
clinical trial |
7/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
BACKGROUND: Although exercise has been shown to relieve depression, little is known about its mechanism or dose-response characteristics. We hypothesized that high intensity progressive resistance training (PRT) would be more effective than either low intensity PRT or standard care by a general practitioner (GP) in depressed elderly persons, and that high intensity PRT would provide superior benefits in quality of life, sleep quality, and self-efficacy. METHODS: Sixty community-dwelling adults > 60 years with major or minor depression were randomized to supervised high intensity PRT (80% maximum load) or low intensity PRT (20% maximum load) 3 days per week for 8 weeks, or GP care. RESULTS: A 50% reduction in the Hamilton Rating Scale of Depression score was achieved in 61% of the high intensity, 29% of the low intensity, and 21% of the GP care group (p = 0.03). Strength gain was directly associated with reduction in depressive symptoms (r = 0.40, p = 0.004), as was baseline social support network type (F = 3.52, p = 0.015), whereas personality type, self-efficacy, and locus of control were unrelated to the antidepressant effect. Vitality quality-of-life scale improved more in the high intensity group than in the others (p = 0.04). Sleep quality improved significantly in all participants (p < 0.0001), with the greatest relative change in high intensity PRT (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: High intensity PRT is more effective than is low intensity PRT or GP care for the treatment of older depressed patients.
|