Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Physical training improves insulin resistance syndrome markers in obese adolescents
Kang HS, Gutin B, Barbeau P, Owens S, Lemmon CR, Allison J, Litaker MS, Le NA
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 2002 Dec;34(12):1920-1927
clinical trial
4/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: No; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that physical training (PT), especially high-intensity PT, would have a favorable effect on components of the insulin resistance syndrome (IRS) in obese adolescents. METHODS: Obese 13- to 16-yr-olds (N = 80) were randomly assigned to one of the following 8-month interventions; (1) lifestyle education (LSE)-alone every 2 wk, (2) LSE+moderate-intensity PT, and (3) LSE+high-intensity PT. PT was offered 5 d/wk. Plasma triacylglycerol (TAG), total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLC), very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDLC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLC), low-density lipoprotein (LDL)) particle size, apolipoproteins AI and B, glucose, insulin, and blood pressure were measured with standardized methods. RESULTS: The intent-to-treat analyses for all subjects who completed pre- and post-tests regardless of their adherence to the interventions showed that the LSE+high-intensity PT group had more favorable changes than the LSE-alone group in TAG level (p = 0.012), TC/HDLC (p = 0.013), and diastolic blood pressure (p = 0.031). For efficacy analyses, all PT subjects who attended at least 2 d/wk (40%) were combined into one group (LSE+PT) and compared with the LSE-alone group. These two-group analyses showed significant interactions (p < 0.001) between baseline values and group membership for deltaTAG, deltaVLDLC, and deltaTC/HDLC, such that subjects who had the least favorable baseline values showed the most beneficial impact of the PT. Of particular interest was a favorable effect of the PT on LDL particle size. CONCLUSION: PT, especially high-intensity PT, had a favorable effect on several IRS markers in obese adolescents.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help