Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Orthotic intervention for development of hand function with C6 quadriplegia
DiPasquale-Lehnerz P
The American Journal of Occupational Therapy 1994 Feb;48(2):138-144
clinical trial
3/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: No; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: No. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVES: Much has been written about the use of static orthoses to maintain proper position and prevent deformity, but there are few empirical data to determine whether static orthoses improve function, maintain range of motion, or prevent deformity in the hand. METHOD: This study measured gains in hand function during a 3-month rehabilitation period in 13 persons with sixth cervical (C6) level complete quadriplegia, 7 of whom wore a static orthosis at night (experimental group) and 6 who did not wear the orthosis (control group). Hand function, range of motion and strength were measured in all subjects 4 weeks and 8 weeks after the study commenced, and again after 12 weeks in only 69% of the subjects. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in hand function between control and experimental groups; hand function had improved significantly in all 13 subjects. CONCLUSION: As the effects of deformity have been clinically observed, future studies should examine the effects of static orthoses with increased daily wear or wear over a longer period of time.
Copyright by the Amerrican Occupational Therapy Association Inc. Reprinted with permission.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help