OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of self-management education on GHb in adults with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We searched for English language trials in Medline (1980 to 1999), CINAHL (1982 to 1999), and the Educational Resources Information Center database (ERIC) (1980 to 1999), and we manually searched review articles, journals with highest topic relevance, and reference lists of included articles. Studies were included if they were randomized controlled trials that were published in the English language, tested the effect of self-management education on adults with type 2 diabetes, and reported extractable data on the effect of treatment on GHb. A total of 31 studies of 463 initially identified articles met selection criteria. We computed net change in GHb, stratified by follow-up interval, tested for trial heterogeneity, and calculated pooled effects sizes using random effects models. We examined the effect of baseline GHb, follow-up interval, and intervention characteristics on GHb. RESULTS: On average, the intervention decreased GHb by 0.76% (95% CI 0.34 to 1.18) more than the control group at immediate follow-up; by 0.26% (0.21% increase to 0.73% decrease) at 1 to 3 months of follow-up; and by 0.26% (0.05 to 0.48) at >= 4 months of follow-up. GHb decreased more with additional contact time between participant and educator; a decrease of 1% was noted for every additional 23.6 h (13.3 to 105.4) of contact. CONCLUSIONS: Self-management education improves GHb levels at immediate follow-up, and increased contact time increases the effect. The benefit declines 1 to 3 months after the intervention ceases, however, suggesting that learned behaviors change over time. Further research is needed to develop interventions effective in maintaining long-term glycemic control.
Copyright American Diabetes Association. Reprinted with permission from The American Diabetes Association.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help

• DOI
• PubMed
• PDF locator
• publisher

A brief summary and a critical assessment of this review may be available at DARE